Deep analysis framework applying instructional design principles to infographic creation.
Before creating an infographic, thoroughly analyze the source material to:
Approach content analysis as a world-class instructional designer:
| Principle | Application |
|---|---|
| Deep Understanding | Read the entire document before analyzing any part |
| Learner-Centered | Focus on what the viewer needs to understand |
| Visual Storytelling | Use visuals to communicate, not just decorate |
| Cognitive Load | Simplify complex ideas without losing accuracy |
| Data Integrity | Never alter, summarize, or paraphrase source facts |
| Type | Characteristics | Best Layout | Best Style |
|---|---|---|---|
| Timeline/History | Sequential events, dates, progression | linear-progression | craft-handmade, aged-academia |
| Process/Tutorial | Step-by-step instructions, how-to | linear-progression, winding-roadmap | ikea-manual, technical-schematic |
| Comparison | A vs B, pros/cons, before-after | binary-comparison, comparison-matrix | corporate-memphis, bold-graphic |
| Hierarchy | Levels, priorities, pyramids | hierarchical-layers, tree-branching | craft-handmade, corporate-memphis |
| Relationships | Connections, overlaps, influences | venn-diagram, hub-spoke, jigsaw | craft-handmade, subway-map |
| Data/Metrics | Statistics, KPIs, measurements | dashboard, periodic-table | corporate-memphis, technical-schematic |
| Cycle/Loop | Recurring processes, feedback loops | circular-flow | craft-handmade, technical-schematic |
| System/Structure | Components, architecture, anatomy | structural-breakdown, bento-grid | technical-schematic, ikea-manual |
| Journey/Narrative | Stories, user flows, milestones | winding-roadmap, story-mountain | storybook-watercolor, comic-strip |
| Overview/Summary | Multiple topics, feature highlights | bento-grid, periodic-table, dense-modules | chalkboard, bold-graphic |
| Product/Buying Guide | Multi-dimension comparisons, specs, pitfalls | dense-modules | morandi-journal, pop-laboratory, retro-pop-grid |
Every infographic should have 1-3 clear learning objectives.
Good Learning Objectives:
Format: "After viewing this infographic, the viewer will understand..."
| Content Aspect | Objective Type |
|---|---|
| Core concept | "...what [topic] is and why it matters" |
| Process | "...how to [accomplish something]" |
| Comparison | "...the key differences between [A] and [B]" |
| Relationships | "...how [elements] connect to each other" |
| Data | "...the significance of [key statistics]" |
| Factor | Questions | Impact |
|---|---|---|
| Knowledge Level | What do they already know? | Determines complexity depth |
| Context | Why are they viewing this? | Determines emphasis points |
| Expectations | What do they hope to learn? | Determines success criteria |
| Visual Preferences | Professional, playful, technical? | Influences style choice |
| Level | Indicators | Layout Recommendation |
|---|---|---|
| Simple (3-5 points) | Few main concepts, clear relationships | sparse layouts, single focus |
| Moderate (6-8 points) | Multiple concepts, some relationships | balanced layouts, clear sections |
| Complex (9+ points) | Many concepts, intricate relationships | dense layouts, multiple sections |
Identify what can be shown rather than told:
| Content Element | Visual Treatment |
|---|---|
| Numbers/Statistics | Large, highlighted numerals |
| Comparisons | Side-by-side, split screen |
| Processes | Arrows, numbered steps, flow |
| Hierarchies | Pyramids, layers, size differences |
| Relationships | Lines, connections, overlapping shapes |
| Categories | Color coding, grouping, sections |
| Timelines | Horizontal/vertical progression |
| Quotes | Callout boxes, quotation marks |
Critical: All factual information must be preserved exactly as written in the source.
| Data Type | Handling Rule |
|---|---|
| Statistics | Copy exactly: "73%" not "about 70%" |
| Quotes | Copy word-for-word with attribution |
| Names | Preserve exact spelling |
| Dates | Keep original format |
| Technical Terms | Do not simplify or substitute |
| Lists | Preserve order and wording |
Never:
Save analysis results to analysis.md:
--- title: "[Main topic title]" topic: "[educational/technical/business/creative/etc.]" data_type: "[timeline/hierarchy/comparison/process/etc.]" complexity: "[simple/moderate/complex]" point_count: [number of main points] source_language: "[detected language]" user_language: "[user's language]" --- ## Main Topic [1-2 sentence summary of what this content is about] ## Learning Objectives After viewing this infographic, the viewer should understand: 1. [Primary objective] 2. [Secondary objective] 3. [Tertiary objective if applicable] ## Target Audience - **Knowledge Level**: [Beginner/Intermediate/Expert] - **Context**: [Why they're viewing this] - **Expectations**: [What they hope to learn] ## Content Type Analysis - **Data Structure**: [How information relates to itself] - **Key Relationships**: [What connects to what] - **Visual Opportunities**: [What can be shown rather than told] ## Key Data Points (Verbatim) [All statistics, quotes, and critical facts exactly as they appear in source] - "[Exact data point 1]" - "[Exact data point 2]" - "[Exact quote with attribution]" ## Layout × Style Signals - Content type: [type] → suggests [layout] - Tone: [tone] → suggests [style] - Audience: [audience] → suggests [style] - Complexity: [level] → suggests [layout density] ## Design Instructions (from user input) [Any style, color, layout, or visual preferences extracted from user's steering prompt] ## Recommended Combinations 1. **[Layout] + [Style]** (Recommended): [Brief rationale] 2. **[Layout] + [Style]**: [Brief rationale] 3. **[Layout] + [Style]**: [Brief rationale]
Before proceeding to structured content generation: